We add that, even if one could somehow imagine that the list is intended merely as an historical report, the implication respecting the Catholic identity of the University would be little better. How pro-life is a university that insists on spreading the word that its students have been in the service of pro-abortion organizations? If Notre Dame students had served internships with the Ku Klux Klan or the American Nazi Party, would this have been dutifully publicized?
Gender Studies Program internships
Then came an even more disturbing revelation by Catholic blogger Kathy Schiffer.
As Ms. Schiffer discovered, Notre Dame’s Gender Studies Program at Notre Dame has funded internships to pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, and pro-embryonic research organizations. They are described in some detail in a report by the Cardinal Newman Society.
It suffices here to note that a 2008 grant went to a student interning with the notoriously pro-abortion National Organization for Women (NOW). NOW describes itself as the “largest organization of women feminists” in the country and lists “championing abortion rights” as a top priority.
The University’s reaction
These disclosures and protests and, we hope, our communications had some effect, though it is impossible to tell whether in the end any significant improvement will result.
In brief, one organization, Emily’s List, was removed from the list, a study will be made and a policy established for internship matters, and a disclaimer was attached to the list. (“Listing here does not constitute an endorsement of the mission of [sic] agenda of these organizations.”)
While these actions are welcome, they fall well short of remedying the current problem and they trigger concern respecting the outcome of the study.
The list is still headed “Summer Internship Opportunities” and students are still directed to the list in the “How to Find a Summer Internship” section. And the fact that only Emily’s List was removed is both troubling and perplexing.
We are told that Emily’s List was removed because it is a single-purpose organization. If that is to be the criterion, the emerging policy will be a bane rather than a boon, for it will license a host of organizations hostile to Catholic teaching.
One need merely look at some of the organizations that remain on the list. They are every bit as objectionable as Emily’s List.
Consider the Feminist Majority Foundation (“FMF”), an especially pernicious organization because of its focus on students. It is dedicated to promoting “abortion, contraception, and family planning, including Medicaid funding and access for minors” (as well as “lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights).”
And to advance that program, FMF “started the Campus Program to inform young feminists about the very real threats to abortion access, women’s rights, affirmative action, and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights posed by right wing extremists.”
Arguably even worse is the National Women’s Law Center because of its anti-Catholic agenda. One of its principal goals is “to ensure that women have access to abortion care by protecting and advancing this fundamental right.”
In pursuit of that goal, the organization assails the Church’s "Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services" and Catholic doctors and hospitals for following them. They thereby deny pregnant women, the Center asserts, “a range of reproductive health services including surgical sterilization, family planning, infertility treatment and abortion.” More, of current interest the Center supports the Obama mandate for contraception, sterilization and abortifacient health insurance coverage for religiously affiliated institutions such as Notre Dame.
There might be legitimate questions as to one or another of the remaining organizations, but the extent of the University’s tolerance is to be tested by the most, not the least, objectionable that it is willing to list.
Finally, the reason for not delisting is unfathomable, at least for us. There is no issue of academic freedom, the organizations have not asked to be listed, Notre Dame owes them nothing, and the students are free to take internships wherever they wish.
There is nothing at stake, that is, except Notre Dame’s reputation as a Catholic university, which has suffered another blow.
A word about the Political Science Department. Our criticism should not be taken as directed to the department, a solid academic unit that has significant strength in terms of Catholic identity. We have no reason to believe that the matter was committed to faculty vote and believe it is not of the sort that ordinarily would be.
Indeed, the department deserves high praise for bringing to Notre Dame next year from Georgetown an outstanding Catholic Scholar, Dr. Patrick Deneen, the founder and director of Georgetown’s splendid Toqueville Forum. As his arresting open statement explaining his decision suggests, the move will be a serious loss to Georgetown and a major gain for Notre Dame.
On the other hand, we do not suppose the chairman acted on his own. Both Fr. Jenkins and Provost Burish received copies of our letter to the chairman and doubtless were familiar with the matter from many other sources. In addition, since the prospective policy evidently will govern all Arts & Letters departments, someone in an A&L leadership position was probably involved. In short, the disposition of the matter can, we believe, properly be assigned to the university.
Let us hope that this works out well in the end.
The Deneen statement. Read the Deneen statement and take heart. In part: “Notre Dame has recruited me explicitly because they regard me as someone who can be a significant contributor to its mission and identity, particularly the Catholic identity of the institution .... It has been a hard and disappointing conclusion to acknowledge that my work at Georgetown was more appreciated and supported by the leadership and a broader swath of faculty in the Notre Dame community than by that of Georgetown.”
Komen and Notre Dame. Several years ago we spotlighted the basketball team’s fund-raising for the Komen fund and Komen’s support of Planned Parenthood. So far as we can tell, the team shifted to a different beneficiary the next year.
But Komen is not so easily shaken at Notre Dame. Despite Komen’s recent notorious divorce from and shotgun remarriage to Planned Parenthood, the University is advertising the women's lacrosse team’s April 28 fundraiser for Komen and is inviting donations. (With a different voice, the Center for Ethics and Culture lamented Komen’s spiritless retreat.)
Bishop Jenky, Notre Dame, and the Obama mandate for contraception, sterilization and abortifacient health insurance coverage. In his homily delivered at a Mass during a 'Call to Catholic Men of Faith' event, Bishop Daniel C. Jenky, C.S.C., one of the Fellows of the University and a member of the board of directors, compared President Obama with Hitler and Stalin in terms of hostility to religious liberty.
"Hitler and Stalin ... would just barely tolerate some churches remaining open, but would not tolerate any competition with the state in education, social services, and health care. In clear violation of our First Amendment rights, Barack Obama – with his radical, pro abortion and extreme secularist agenda, now seems intent on following a similar path."
One hundred Notre Dame faculty members have called for Bishop Jenky's resignation as a Fellow and board member.
Father Jenkins has yet to endorse the bishops' condemnation of President Obama's meretricious "accommodation" respecting the mandate for contraception, sterilization and abortifacient health insurance coverage.
Notre Dame should immediately strike from the Political Science website list of internship possibilities the names of all organizations whose missions include aims hostile to fundamental Church teachings and should develop a policy against encouraging, funding, or giving credit for internships in such organizations. If you agree and would like to help with our mission of Catholic renewal at Notre Dame, please click here.