Blog

Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness!

print
#NotreDame Trustees receive #SycamoreTrust petition and open letter from more than 100 alumni attorneys warning of a judicial inquiry. #GoCatholicND Click To Tweet

In our current bulletin, we reproduce a letter we have sent to the University of Notre Dame Trustees submitting a petition from alumni and friends urging them to end the provision of abortifacients to students and employees and to reverse Father Jenkins’s decision to include contraceptives in Notre Dame’s health plans for students and employees.

We forwarded also the Open Letter to Father Jenkins by over 100 alumni attorneys describing how it now appears Notre Dame filed a sham lawsuit against the Obamacare contraception mandate. Father Jenkins has decided the University should do precisely what its attorneys and Executive Vice President swore to the courts it could not do in good conscience as a Catholic school. The attorneys call for a judicial inquiry in the absence of an explanation.

In our letter, we draw the attention of the Trustees to our recent bulletins in support of the Petition, and we supplement considerably the evidence in support of the lawyer’s conclusion that, from all that appears, Notre Dame played fast and loose with the courts. The trustees now must choose between what Father Jenkins has decided and what Notre Dame told the court. They can either preserve Notre Dame’s reputation for integrity or invite a judicial inquiry that would, from all that appears, sully it badly.

We have told the Trustees that the Petition remains open for additional signatures and so, too, does the lawyers’ Open Letter. We urge all to read the bulletin and to sign the Petition  if you concur, and to join the Open Letter if  you are an attorney with a Notre Dame degree of any type.

SIGN THE PETITION      JOIN ATTORNEYS LETTER

 


June 17, 2018

[Trustee Name/Address Block]

Dear [Trustee],

On behalf of the Officers and Board of Sycamore Trust, I attach a Petition from alumni and others of the Notre Dame family urging you to:

  1. End promptly the provision of abortifacients and contraceptives by the University’s insurers to its students and employees;
  2. Adhere to the University’s long-standing policy against covering contraceptives in its health insurance programs; and
  3. End promptly the University’s enabling employees to secure cut-rate abortifacients through the University’s Flexible Savings Program.

We also attach an “Open Letter to Father Jenkins from Notre Dame Alumni Attorneys” respecting what they term “a collection of apparent flat-out misrepresentations” by the University to the courts in the Obamacare mandate litigation. The signatories call for a judicial inquiry in the absence of an exculpatory explanation.

We continue to collect signatures on both documents – there are at the moment 1,158 on the first and 110 attorneys on the second – but we send them to you now because contraceptives are scheduled to be included in the employee program next month and in the student program in August.

The imminence of the July date prompts us also to suggest that, if you need additional time, you take whatever steps your lawyers prescribe to forestall objections if you remove contraceptives after the new policies go into effect.

The question of inclusion of contraceptives in the University’s health insurance programs is straightforward and, we think, really rhetorical. It is:

Should Notre Dame of its own accord put in the hands of its employees and students the means to commit actions the Catholic Church teaches are gravely sinful – both contraception and the illicit sex it facilitates?

Your choice is between the policy Dr. Affleck-Graves swore to the courts was Notre Dame’s and the directly opposite policy Father Jenkins has announced.

Compare,

Dr. Affleck-Graves, affidavit of December 9, 2013: “Notre Dame’s Catholic beliefs prohibit it from paying for, facilitating access to, and/or becoming entangled in the provision of abortion-producing products, contraceptives, or sterilization.

With,

Father Jenkins’s statement of February 7, 2018: “The University will provide coverage in the University’s own insurance plans for simple contraceptives.”

We leave largely to the Petition the reasons why Notre Dame, as a Catholic school, should adhere to its long-standing policy against covering contraceptives in its health insurance programs. We do urge you to examine also our recent bulletins, “Conveniently Blind” and “School For Scandal,” disclosing that, contrary to Father Jenkins’s representation, Notre Dame’s programs will cover many contraceptives that cause abortions; that the scandal will be exacerbated by the prescription and provision of contraceptives on campus; and that the student reaction has included the distribution of over a thousand contraceptives on campus and demands for full availability of contraceptives to all students.

In addition, we think the data showing the sexually charged environment at the University are pertinent to the University’s tolerance of fornication that would be implied by its supplying contraceptives to students. If you have been given the University’s most recent “Sexual Climate” survey, you will have seen that responses from somewhat less than half of the students reported 91 rapes during the preceding twelve months, or about 10 a month assuming they occurred during the school year.  “Deeply troubling” indeed, as the University said.

But there is more to be said about the evident abuse of the judicial process by the University than is in the lawyer’s Open Letter, and we think we should say it since you are responsible for preserving the University’s integrity and since there is the real prospect of a judicial inquiry, as we show later.

We think it clear that Father Jenkins’s actions since the Trump administration settled with Notre Dame last year demonstrate that the affidavit of Dr. Affleck-Graves and the representations of counsel were false, whether they knew it or not. Those multiple representations were, in short, that a “deeply and sincerely held core tenet of Notre Dame’s religion” is that contraception is a “serious moral wrong,” and that accordingly “Notre Dame’s Catholic beliefs prohibit it from facilitating access to contraception.”

This description of University policy cannot be squared with Father Jenkins’s refusal to this day to accept the exemption tendered by the Trump administration last October in settlement of the litigation.  The University has thereby compelled its insurers to continue providing free contraceptives notwithstanding its professions to the court that its “deeply and sincerely held Catholic beliefs prohibit it” from doing just that.

And now Father Jenkins proposes in effect to double down in flouting the University’s representations by having the University itself provide the contraceptives.

Why would Notre Dame launch such a pretend lawsuit?  We believe the answer lies in events in the closing months of 2013 that were not, but should have been, disclosed to the court. Here is what happened:

When the Obama Administration proposed the so-called “accommodation” amendments to the regulations in 2012 in an attempt to pacify religious organizations, the USCCB and many others weighed in against them, so when they became final in June of 2013 scores of religious organizations were poised to, and did, sue.

But not Notre Dame. It did not renew the lawsuit it had brought before the “accommodation.” Instead, it quietly decided to comply. The University advised employees in an October 9 description of the 2014 insurance program, “Our third party administrator, Meritain Health, will be offering contraception coverage” and “will be providing information directly to eligible members.”

Less than two months later, however, the University reversed itself.  It sued on December 3, just before the regulations went into effect on January 1, 2014.

Why did it do that? The answer, we believe, is that Father Jenkins attended the November meeting of the USCCB where some leading bishops urged him to have Notre Dame, the country’s most prominent Catholic university, join the litigation.

We believe this to be true based on multiple sources and Father Jenkins’s silence when we put the question to him, most recently in this February 12, 2018, message from Bill Dempsey:

Dear Father Jenkins, I am assembling facts pertinent to a possible Rule 11 proceeding, and I want to be sure I have given you an adequate opportunity to comment where appropriate. My understanding is that you attended the U.S. Bishops’ General Assembly in Baltimore in November of 2013 and that one or more of the participants urged you to have Notre Dame institute a lawsuit challenging the Obamacare mandate. I am confident about this; but, as I say, I want you to have an opportunity to respond if you wish.

This episode should have been disclosed to Judge Simon when he pressed for an explanation of Notre Dame’s long delay in filing suit. He would doubtless have been even more insistent if he had known that the University had decided to comply less than two months before.

Instead, Notre Dame submitted another affidavit by Dr. Affleck-Graves in which he cited the complexity of the issues and uncertainty about the insurers’ plans, none of which impressed Judge Simon. In his opinion denying Notre Dame an injunction, he said, “The affidavit detailing excuses for the late filing of this lawsuit are frankly a little hard to swallow.”

The short of it is that, in reversing his decision to comply with the mandate, Father Jenkins changed his position but evidently not his mind.

And there is still more to support that conclusion. It is suggestive, for example, that Dr. Affleck-Graves rather than Father Jenkins swore to the affidavit submitted to the court.

Then, after the court refused to grant an injunction, Father Jenkins contradicted Dr. Affleck-Graves in declaring, “I don’t see this as a scandal because we are not giving out contraceptives.”  That was the government’s argument.

Finally, Father Jenkins’s effort to explain why he has decided to do what the University told the court it could never do in good conscience is revelatory.

In his letter of February 7, to faculty, he said: “Some will ask why the University sued the government over the provision of contraceptive drugs and services only now to provide contraceptives in its plan. What we sincerely and firmly fought for in court was the ability, as a Catholic institution, to make decisions about the provision of health care consistent with Catholic principles.”

But that is not what Notre Dame told the court it would “fight for.” The notion that the government must simply leave to Notre Dame the “decisions about the provision of health care” is frivolous. What Notre Dame alleged was that the mandate imposed a “substantial burden” on the exercise of its religion – the statutory standard – not that it “might,” much less that it was none of the government’s business. And what “some will ask” is why the provision of contraceptives is suddenly no burden at all.

We have gone into detail on this question of misrepresentation both because of its importance and because we want you to know what we would say in suggesting to the court a Rule 11 inquiry should it come to that, which we surely hope it does not.

A concluding word about Rule 11: Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes a federal court to inquire into whether a party has been guilty of misrepresentations to the court and to impose sanctions if it has. While we were not parties to the litigation and do not have standing to file a motion, we can bring the matter to the attention of Judge Simon for the 100-plus Notre Dame alumni attorneys and he can take action on his own if he wishes.

Moreover, we would of course provide our submission to counsel for the parties, who would have standing to file a Rule 11 motion.  Those parties were the Secretary of Health and Human Services and several Notre Dame graduate students represented by Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

We should note that Americans United knew, as Judge Simon did not, that Notre Dame reversed position at the end of 2013. Questioning Notre Dame’s sincerity, the American United lawyer, Gregory Lipper, raised the point in questioning Notre Dame’s sincerity in the Court of Appeals; and in a recent essay in “Law, Religion, and Health in the United States” (p.6) he recounted Father Jenkins’s calling the accommodation a “welcome step” and saying that “going along” with it would not “compromise our conscience,” and he related how Notre Dame had in fact “gone along” in October of 2013 only to sue in December. He thought the urging of “a powerful alumni group” might have been the reason. He would doubtless be interested in the real reason.

We close by reminding you of the “strong objection” to Father Jenkins’s decision by Notre Dame’s bishop, the Most Rev. Kevin C. Rhoades. And Cardinal James Dolan, who may have been among those who spoke to Father Jenkins in Baltimore as chair of the USCCB, was “baffled” by Notre Dame’s “It wasn’t all that important to us, anyway” attitude.

The Fellows of the University are expressly charged by its statutes with maintaining its Catholic identity, and the Trustees’ fiduciary duty is to secure Notre Dame’s Mission as a Catholic university. The issues raised here implicate important questions of institutional integrity and cooperation with grave evil. We urge you to keep faith with both Church and State by ratifying Dr. Affleck-Graves’s representations to the court as the past, present, and future policy of the University of Notre Dame.

Respectfully,

William H. Dempsey
President

On behalf of the Officers and Directors of Sycamore Trust:

Timothy M. Dempsey, ‘89
Charles A. Donovan, Jr., ‘74
John L. Hannan, ‘78
Mary Rice Hasson, ‘82
Katherine Kersten, ‘73
Jonathan Liedl, ‘11
Elizabeth Kirk, ‘96 (Secretary)
Rev. John J. Raphael, ‘89
Joseph A. Reich, Jr., ‘57 (Vice President)
Lisa Scapellati, ‘81 (Treasurer)
Dr. Susan Biddle Shearer, ‘88

Letter to Notre Dame Trustees on Petition and Judicial Inquiry

SIGN THE PETITION      JOIN ATTORNEYS LETTER

38 Responses to “Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness!”

  1. I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I’ll bookmark your blog and check again here frequently. I am quite sure I’ll learn lots of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!

  2. Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you can do with some pics to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is wonderful blog. A great read. I’ll definitely be back.

  3. I¡¦m not positive where you are getting your information, however good topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or working out more. Thanks for excellent info I used to be searching for this information for my mission.

  4. I have read some just right stuff here. Certainly value bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much attempt you place to make this type of excellent informative website.

  5. Keep functioning ,remarkable job!

  6. I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, but I never discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours. It¡¦s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content material as you did, the internet can be much more useful than ever before.

  7. Hi there, You have done an incredible job. I will definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am sure they’ll be benefited from this site.

  8. I simply wanted to say thanks again. I’m not certain the things I would’ve carried out in the absence of these points provided by you regarding such field. It was before a real daunting difficulty in my view, nevertheless considering the very skilled style you treated the issue took me to jump with fulfillment. Extremely grateful for the advice and then expect you comprehend what a great job that you’re putting in training the rest all through your site. Most likely you’ve never met all of us.

  9. Thank you for all your work on this site. Gloria enjoys carrying out investigation and it’s really easy to understand why. All of us hear all about the lively mode you convey vital things through this website and cause response from others about this point then our own child is without a doubt learning a lot. Enjoy the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one carrying out a powerful job.

  10. Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your site, how can i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  11. certainly like your web site however you need to test the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to inform the truth then again I¡¦ll certainly come again again.

  12. Someone necessarily assist to make critically articles I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and thus far? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this particular put up incredible. Great process!

  13. Hello.This post was extremely interesting, particularly because I was looking for thoughts on this topic last Thursday.

  14. I have to get across my admiration for your generosity supporting persons who really want assistance with the area. Your very own dedication to getting the message all over has been extraordinarily functional and has in every case enabled ladies like me to reach their endeavors. Your new helpful publication signifies a great deal to me and far more to my colleagues. With thanks; from each one of us.

  15. I think other site proprietors should take this website as an model, very clean and great user genial style and design, let alone the content. You’re an expert in this topic!

  16. Wow! Thank you! I constantly wanted to write on my site something like that. Can I take a portion of your post to my website?

  17. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  18. Thanks , I have recently been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I’ve found out till now. But, what concerning the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?

  19. Great weblog right here! Additionally your web site a lot up fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate link in your host? I desire my site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  20. I simply wanted to say thanks again. I’m not certain the things I would’ve carried out in the absence of these points provided by you regarding such field. It was before a real daunting difficulty in my view, nevertheless considering the very skilled style you treated the issue took me to jump with fulfillment. Extremely grateful for the advice and then expect you comprehend what a great job that you’re putting in training the rest all through your site. Most likely you’ve never met all of us.

  21. You can definitely see your expertise within the work you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. Always go after your heart.

  22. Wow, marvelous weblog layout! How lengthy have you been blogging for? you made blogging glance easy. The overall look of your website is fantastic, as well as the content!

  23. I have read some just right stuff here. Certainly value bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much attempt you place to make this type of excellent informative website.

  24. I intended to send you a very small observation to say thanks the moment again on the awesome thoughts you’ve featured in this article. It has been so shockingly generous with you to provide publicly what many individuals would’ve sold for an electronic book to end up making some bucks for themselves, particularly considering the fact that you could have tried it if you ever desired. The thoughts likewise served to become a fantastic way to know that other people have the identical zeal the same as mine to see a good deal more when considering this condition. I’m certain there are millions of more pleasant times in the future for individuals that read through your website.

  25. I as well as my guys were actually digesting the good ideas from your web site then at once I had a terrible feeling I never expressed respect to you for those secrets. The men ended up for that reason warmed to read them and have really been enjoying them. Appreciation for actually being quite kind as well as for making a decision on certain amazing subject matter most people are really wanting to be informed on. My sincere regret for not expressing gratitude to you earlier.

  26. Wow! This can be one particular of the most beneficial blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject. Actually Great. I’m also an expert in this topic so I can understand your hard work.

  27. I really appreciate this post. I¡¦ve been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You have made my day! Thank you again

  28. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.

  29. Someone necessarily assist to make critically articles I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and thus far? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this particular put up incredible. Great process!

  30. whoah this weblog is excellent i like reading your posts. Keep up the great paintings! You know, a lot of people are looking around for this information, you can aid them greatly.

  31. Hiya, I am really glad I have found this info. Nowadays bloggers publish just about gossips and internet and this is actually irritating. A good site with interesting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this web site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

  32. Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your site, how can i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  33. I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, but I never discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours. It¡¦s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content material as you did, the internet can be much more useful than ever before.

  34. I am not sure where you are getting your info, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for excellent information I was looking for this information for my mission.

  35. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!

  36. I really appreciate this post. I¡¦ve been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You have made my day! Thank you again

  37. Br. Rene D. Roy, F.M.S. June 29, 2018 at 5:32 am

    If the “premier Catholic University in the United States” promotes such disregard for God’s law, it had better examine and act on its mission and its purpose to educate and promote Catholic teaching, which is based on Truth. If the Truth is obscured or ignored, why does such a university exist?
    Br. Rene D. Roy, F.M.S. ’71

  38. Marion Gingras June 28, 2018 at 6:50 pm

    William Dempsey, Thanks so much for all you do. We are so lucky to have you and the Sycamore Board working to hold Notre Dame accountable, and keeping us all informed about campus happenings.

    I thoroughly enjoyed the breakfast, attending again this year. As before, I took extra programs to pass them out to other alums that I thought would care. We all know how important getting the word out is.