Blog

Rainbow is thy fame

Print

Introduction

With the permission of First Things, we bring you  from its pages a sobering reflection on Father Jenkins’s nearly two decades  as Notre Dame’s  President by Sycamore Trustee and Irish Rover Editor-in-Chief Emerita  Mary Frances Myler (ND ’22). 

As we have emphasized on multiple occasions, the events discussed by Ms. Myler in her article “Rainbow is They Fame” are symptoms of  the radical decline of Catholic representation on Notre Dame’s faculty.

This decline, indeed, is so pronounced that, as we have pointed out,  the University no longer meets its own Mission Statement test of Catholic identity, namely,  “the continuing presence of a predominant number of Catholic intellectuals” on the faculty.  

The restoration of a predominantly Catholic faculty was Father Jenkins’s most important challenge when he took office. Instead of meeting it, he acquiesced in a faculty recommendation to maintain the current rate of hiring Catholic faculty.

This was his most consequential failure.

We note that our inception as an independent alumni organization was directly related to an event discussed by Ms.  Myler — Father Jenkins’s sanctioning the student production of the Vagina Monologues, a paean to lesbian sex, after his initial disapproval was met by faculty protest. This triggered a wave of alumni protest that gave birth to Sycamore Trust.

Ms. Myler speculates that Father Jenkins’s decision to allow the show to proceed was a calculated move on the assumption “that disgruntled conservatives posed less of a risk than an increasingly liberal campus hegemony.”

If that was so, then this year’s summary of our work is a testament to his mistake.

Your Support Makes a Difference!

Without the financial support of our friends, we would be unable to continue our work to keep you informed of Notre Dame’s imperiled Catholic identity, organize events and activities to strengthen our collective voice, and support the efforts on campus by students and their organizations to stand tall for the Truth of Catholicism. Please consider giving to Sycamore Trust as we fight together for a “return to glory” in an authentic Catholic renewal under the Dome

RAINBOW IS THY FAME​

By Mary Frances Myler

University of Notre Dame president Fr. Theodore Hesburgh, C.S.C., transformed Catholic education. In the 1967 Land O’Lakes Statement, he laid out his vision for the Catholic university in the modern world, calling for autonomy from the Catholic Church’s authority. Charismatic and well-connected, he was a liberalizing force in an increasingly secular educational environment, transferring ownership of Notre Dame from the Congregation of Holy Cross to a lay board, admitting women into the student body, building the school’s capacity for research, and chasing prestige while expanding the school’s footprint. Hesburgh was a tough act to follow, but if there’s anything to learn from the recent history of Notre Dame, it’s that transformational leaders aren’t always visionaries.

Fr. John Jenkins, C.S.C., doesn’t command a room like his famed predecessor. Preparing to retire after an eighteen-year tenure, Jenkins has built on Hesburgh’s legacy with the continued growth of fundraising and research facilities. But something far more interesting transpired during his two decades at the helm—the sexual revolution came to that little campus in South Bend, Indiana. 

At his inauguration in 2005, Jenkins spoke of higher education’s descent into secularism, acknowledging that many of the “other truly great universities in this country . . . began as religious, faith-inspired institutions, but nearly all have left that founding character behind.” Not so at Notre Dame, he promised: “If we are afraid to be different from the world, how can we make a difference in the world?” 

It wasn’t long before the campus left tested Jenkins’s promise. A performance of Eve Ensler’s feminist play The Vagina Monologues was scheduled to take place on campus during his first year on the job. Jenkins initially took a strong stance against the performance, emphasizing that the play’s graphic portrayals of sexuality stand “in opposition to the view that human sexuality finds its proper expression in the committed relationship of marriage between a man and a woman that is open to the gift of procreation.” The play’s performance at Notre Dame, Jenkins explained in January 2006, “suggest[ed] that the university endorses certain themes in the play, or at least finds them compatible with its values.” 

But despite his condemnations, Jenkins looked to the public, taking the views of the show’s advocates and opponents into consideration. It wasn’t long before he changed his mind, hedging that disgruntled conservatives posed less of a risk than an increasingly liberal campus hegemony. 

Once a reason to oppose the Vagina Monologues, the university’s Catholic identity was suddenly the impetus behind allowing the performances, replete with depictions of homosexual, extramarital, and auto-erotic sexual experiences. “Catholic teaching has nothing to fear from engaging the wider culture,” Jenkins said when explaining the rationale behind his reversal. “But we all have something to fear if the wider culture never engages Catholic teaching.” 

Catholic teaching has nothing to fear from culture, but Catholic institutions do, as do Catholics themselves. Jenkins’s decision wasn’t evangelization as much as it was capitulation, falling prey to the pretense that there can be half measures when dealing with the sexual revolution.

But when Barack Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandated that religious organizations provide contraceptives, sterilization procedures, and abortifacients through health insurance, Jenkins took a stand. In 2012, the university filed a suit against the HHS for an infringement of religious freedom. After five years of legal battles, Notre Dame won in 2017; it would not have to provide drugs and services contrary to Catholic beliefs. 

Yet, mere days after securing victory, Jenkins reversed course. Under no threat of further legal action, Notre Dame decided to provide contraceptives after all. “Stopping any access to contraceptives through our health care plan would allow the University to be free of involvement with drugs that are morally objectionable in Catholic teaching,” Jenkins explained, “but it would burden those who have made conscientious decisions about the use of such drugs and rely on the University for health care benefits.”

Prior to the HHS mandate, Notre Dame had not provided contraceptives. But during the lawsuit, Jenkins said, “some of those enrolled in our health plans—an increasingly diverse group—have come to rely on access to contraceptives.” Once again, the university president appeased the conscientious, diverse few despite protestations from the Catholic many. 

Jenkins’s initial opposition to earlier hallmarks of the sexual revolution—performative feminism in the Vagina Monologues and the separation of sex from procreation in birth control—was soon followed by qualified endorsements. By the time the LGBTQ issue came to campus, Jenkins had little resistance to spare. When Notre Dame extended employment benefits to the same-sex partners of faculty and staff, Jenkins publicly praised the decision as part of the university’s effort to “welcome, support, and cherish gay and lesbian brothers and sisters.” That effort, he said, “must not and will not flag.”

And flag it has not. The not-so-fallacious slippery slope of pro-LGBTQ policy quickly led to a mealy-mouthed acceptance of transgenderism. While incoming freshmen are universally paired with random roommates and sorted into single-sex dorms, transgender students get special treatment from administrators who “handpick” their residence halls. This February, the university opened a new co-ed residence community and would not respond when asked if the community was designed to accommodate transgender students. 

When multiple academic departments sponsored a drag show on campus this fall, nary a word was heard from Jenkins or his administration. It’s a poetic conclusion to his presidency: Nearly two decades after he first opposed the Vagina Monologues, transvestites took the stage to mock the very womanhood that Ensler’s play ostensibly sought to glorify. 

Hesburgh gave women a seat at the table, but Jenkins sold out to the godless disciples of the sexual revolution. Sometimes the most transformative leaders aren’t visionaries; sometimes, they’re just weak. 

Mary Frances Myler is a writer living in Washington, D.C. She graduated from the University of Notre Dame, where she served as the editor in chief of the Irish Rover. 

Image by The White House licensed via Creative Commons. Image cropped.  

Picture of Mary Frances Myler, '22

Mary Frances Myler, '22

Mary Frances Myler, '22, is a member Sycamore Trust's board of directors, editor-in-chief emerita of the Irish Rover and a member of the Rover’s board of directors. She is a post-graduate fellow with the Center for Citizenship and Constitutional Government and is writing a book about Catholic identity in higher education.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Oremus

Let no one deceive himself. If any one among you thinks that he is wise in this age, let him become a fool that he may become wise. For the wisdom of this world is folly with God. (1 Cor 3:18-19)

O God our Father, Eternal Wisdom and Love, You have created us in Your own image and likeness, and called us to live in humble obedience to You and according to the order which You have established to govern the universe. You sent Your Son, Wisdom Incarnate, to save us from sin and to reconcile us to You and to one another. He established the Church to be a saving witness of Wisdom and Love, Goodness and Truth to a rebellious world. We implore You to dispel the darkness that surrounds us. May all who have rejected the truths of creation, seeking to replace Your design for the human race with one of their own, be awakened to the destructive folly which passes for wisdom in this age. Enlighten us all by the Truth which sets us free and grant that we may courageously embrace the scorn and contempt of the wise of the world so that we may joyfully share in the Wisdom of God. Through the intercession of Notre Dame, our Mother, we make our prayer in the Name of Jesus, Your Son, Who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, God, forever and ever. Amen.

The above prayer is by Sycamore Trustee Father John Raphael (’89). To join us in regular prayer projects such as our Novena for Catholic Education and our Meditation on the 12-Days of Christmas, please join our Apostolate.

Submit Your Mass Intention

Father John J. Raphael (’89) offers a monthly Mass for the intentions of our Sycamore Trust community. If you have an intention that you would like him to include at his next Mass, you may submit it by clicking on the following button.

Support Our Common Purpose

If you share our love for Notre Dame and want to see an authentic Catholic renewal under the Dome, please consider lending a hand in whatever way you are able — by giving of your time (especially in prayer), talent, or treasure.  The funds we receive are used to continue our work to keep you informed of Notre Dame’s imperiled Catholic identity, organize events and activities to strengthen our collective voice, and financially support the efforts on campus by students and their organizations to stand tall for the Truth of Catholicism.

Tagged As: , , ,

16 Responses to “Rainbow is thy fame”

  1. John T RIely, ND 1981 December 28, 2023 at 5:03 pm

    Ms. Myler’s essay is both thoughtful and thought provoking. As others comment below, I have always assumed Jenkins was a morally obtuse, disordered man. Ms. Myler’s piece suggests alternatively Jenkins is a coward afraid to stand up to the hard left and the LGBTQ and abortion militants knowing well (and accurately) that they would cause far more disruption and blow back to campus life and culture than polite and respectful Catholics ingrained over the generations to get along and go along and to not question the clerics on matters of morality. If this is true, then we are all to blame for allowing a spineless man to head ND for 18 years without demanding and securing his departure.

  2. “Sometimes the most transformative leaders aren’t visionaries; sometimes, they’re just weak. ”

    Very good summary statement on the entirety of Fr. Jenkins’ presidency of Notre Dame. I reached the same conclusion years ago. For a man as well educated as he is, I found it difficult in the early days of his administration to understand his inability to apply Catholic moral principles. I can understand that the university is an environment that allows faculty members the liberty to explore their academic subjects and that, as a consequence, some faculty will stray from Catholic moral principles. However, the administration of the university is well within the president’s purview for applying such principles. In every circumstance in which Fr. Jenkins had the opportunity to do so, he submitted to the opposing side and usually gave a weak, feeble argument defending his descision. Sometimes that argument referenced the need to “welcome others”, but it was always in the context of allowing them to do what is known to be sinful by using the university’s resources. Rather, Fr. Jenkins’ welcoming them to understand the beauty of Catholic morality and to struggle to become better versions of themselves in adhering to its principles would have been a perfect approach. For the petulant and disagreeable among the university’s faculty and staff, for whom such adherence is inconceivable, I would have said “Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.” For a man with so much education, each such opportunity was a sad performance, derived from weak leadership abilities.

  3. “Truth is a defense against a charge of libel and slander.”

    From the moment of conception, every son or daughter of a human person, has been Created In The Image And Likeness Of God, equal in Dignity, while being Complementary as a beloved son or daughter, Willed By God, The Most Holy And Undivided Blessed Trinity, worthy of Redemption.

    Could there possibly be a greater act of defamation of one’s personhood, than denying the essence of being, in essence, a beloved son or daughter from the moment of conception and denying that innocent son or daughter their inherent Dignity, by denying they possess an inherent Right to Life, the securing and protection upon which protecting their inherent Right To Liberty and The Pursuit Of Happiness depends in order to justify the act of abortion?

    Error has no rights, although it can sometimes serve to illuminate that which is true; Academic Freedom, is not the right to call that which is evil, good, and defame the very essence of the inherent Dignity of every human person.

  4. Stephen H Fralish December 23, 2023 at 10:30 pm

    Thank you Mary Frances for such a clear and stunning indictment of Fr. Jenkins tenure. A decade before your attendance at ND I can remember vividly the pomp and circumstance Fr. Hesburgh bestowed on Obama during his commencement visit in 2009. However, I can also recall with some consolation the VAST and HUGE pro-life protests that put ND in a very poor light, especially on Fox News. Further, I believe the University’s coffers and alumni giving were depressed for a period of time after this insult to Our Lady. I can only hope and pray that Fr. Jenkins’s successor – Fr. Robert Dowd – might exhibit a stronger backbone to resist ALL forms of Modernism that have besieged the Church for the past 120 years. His bios in the media don’t reveal much about who he really is and how he might respond when having to decide between what what is truly good and what is truly evil.

  5. Mary Francis’ article was an eye-opener for me (SMC ‘82) as I consider St. Mary’s decision to admit transgendered applicants and their very warped rationale for withdrawal from that decision. Clearly, they took their cue from the Jenkins’ legacy in trying to enhance their status by eliminating the Catholic identity of St. Mary’s. It is strange that neither school’s leadership seems to even conceive of what it means to be Catholic, much less engage in truth seeking.

  6. I think Ms. Myler underestimates John Jenkins. I don’t believe he was some weakling who got swept away by the currents of todays society. I think the changes that are happening on Notre Dame’s campus, as with many other college campuses, are part of a deliberate coordinated effort by leftists to change American society. I note that Obama is reported to have recently contacted the Harvard Board of Trustees to ask them to not take action against Harvard’s president for failing to condemn calls for genocide against Jewish people on Harvard’s campus and her alleged multiple incidents of plagiarism. Is it just coincidence that Pope Francis is calling for the blessing of homosexual relationships after this long course of embracing homosexuality on Notre Dame’s campus the last several years? Hardly. Do we really think there is no relationship between Notre Dame and Chicago’s Cardinal Cupich and Cardinal Cupich and Pope Francis and quite probably Cardinal Cupich and Obama?
    I think it is unfortunate no effort was made to organize a campaign to lobby the Notre Dame Board of Directors to consider Fr. Wilson Miscamble or bring someone in from outside Notre Dame as president to restore Notre Dames catholic identity as Notre Dame’s new president. Bishop Joseph Strickland is a well-experienced administrator and culture warrior/defender of the faith. Fr. Mike Schmitz is a strong defender of the faith and appeals to the young. For those that say they aren’t Holy Cross priests, Miscamble is and for a campus that is currently violating it’s bylaws regarding Catholic identity and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, I don’t think ND has a leg to stand on as far as arguing against waiving the rule that the president of ND must be a Holy Cross priest. Don’t be surprised if the next president after Fr. Bob Dowd (with all due respect, who?) is a lay woman. Remember the liberal mantra, rules for thee, but not for me.

    • Is it just coincidence that Pope Francis is calling for the blessing of homosexual relationships..”

      No, as a Cardinal, Jorge Bergoglio stated in his book, On Heaven and Earth, in regards to same-sex sexual relationships, and thus same-sex sexual acts, prior to his election as pope, on page 117, demonstrating that he does not hold, keep, or teach The Catholic Faith, and he continues to act accordingly: “If there is a union of a private nature, there is neither a third party, nor is society affected. Now, if the union is given the category of marriage, there could be children affected. Every person needs a male father and a female mother that can help shape their identity.”- Jorge Bergoglio, denying The Sanctity of the marital act within The Sacrament of Holy Matrimony, and the fact that God, The Most Holy And Undivided Blessed Trinity, Through The Unity Of The Holy Ghost, Is The Author Of Love, Of Life, And Of Marriage, while denying sin done in private is sin.

      Christ’s Church, out of Love and Compassion for the wellbeing of persons who have developed a disordered same sex sexual inclination desire that these beloved sons and daughters be treated with respect, and compassion, by making it clear that such persons must refrain from acting on their disordered sexual inclinations, for such demeaning sexual acts can never be approved.
      Furthermore,The Church teaches:
      “2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.”
      Thus to Bless any couple who identifies as a couple based upon a disordered sexual relationship, would in essence be not a Blessing, but a curse, as it would be an obstacle to their repentance and acceptance of Salvational Love, God’s Gift Of Grace And Mercy, available to all who desire to repent, serve their Penance , and believe The Good News , Our Lord And Savior, Jesus Christ Is Risen!

  7. Richard Creedon '62 December 23, 2023 at 8:59 pm

    O
    In 2012 at our 50th Reunion in the ACC, each of the graduates went up to the stage to have their picture taken with Fr. Jenkins…..except for me. I did not want a photograph taken showing me shaking the hand of a man who has done so much to destroy the Catholic character of my beloved Alma Mater.
    I needed no vindication of my decision but sadly, subsequent events have proven my decision to be the right one.
    I now support Ave Maria University and Christendom College, both of which openly and proudly follow the teaching magisterium of our Catholic Church. Yes, I also support Sycamore Trust because we are an Alleluia people who always look forward to better days.

  8. Jeanette Benedetto December 23, 2023 at 8:39 pm

    I am saddened to hear what has happened at Notre Dame, Our Lady’s Namesake over the years. I pray that the new President will be able to bring Notre Dame back to its Catholic Roots.

  9. I think his administration can best be summed up by the first thing he did after he had been appointed president, even before he took office. He had Notre Dame’s football coach fired and went to Urban Meyer in an attempt to get him to become ND’s next football coach, even though it seemed likely that Meyer had already made a verbal commitment elsewhere. He failed. That seems like a picture of the rest of his administration.

  10. The marital act is Life-affirming and Life-sustaining, and can only be consummated by a man and woman united in marriage as husband and wife.

    The Catholic Church, and thus Faithful Catholics recognize the Sacramental Essence Of The Sacrament Of Holy Matrimony.

    Here lies the great deception.

    Pornography is what pornography does, it demeans the inherent Dignity of all beloved sons and daughter. Thus the desire to engage in pornographic acts of any nature, does not change the nature of the acts.

    There are those, who would argue that reordering beloved sons and daughters according to their sexual desires, inclination, orientation, their so called “sexuality”, can justify engaging in sexual acts that are physically, psychologically, emotionally, and spiritually harmful, and thus are not and can never be acts of authentic Love.

    This is a great deception, for no one should be engaging in such pornographic acts, including a man and woman united in marriage as husband and wife because they demean our inherent Dignity as human persons.

    Love, which is rightly ordered to the inherent personal and relational Dignity of the human person, is devoid of lust.

  11. Thanks, Mary Frances. Not just sad, but unforgivable. A once-Catholic institution of great renown and repute is, today, merely another purveyor of lies.

  12. Thank you Mary frances for bringing to light the failure of Fr.Jenkins as president of of our beloved Notre Dame

  13. A well written opinion piece by Mary Frances Myler. Thank you.

    Fr. Jenkins’ decisions are why the Church is leaving Catholics. It’s not Catholics leaving the Church.

  14. Paul D. Fuchs, M.D. December 23, 2023 at 3:53 pm

    Mary Frances Myler’s essay on Fr. John Jenkins, C.S.C, and his tenure as president of the University of Notre Dame is a sad but honest depiction of Father Jenkins’ lack of moral courage, and the University’s diminished prominence as an authentic Catholic institution.

Comments & Questions